Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of A.K.K.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 9, 1984No. C8-84-269PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order terminating the appellant-mother’s rights to her child. The trial court found that the child had been adjudicated dependent, and that the mother would not be likely to change her behavior in the foreseeable future. We affirm.
FACTS
On May 11, 1982, a petition was filed with the Anoka County Court, alleging that the appellant’s child was neglected within the meaning of Minn.Stat. § 260.015(10)(a) and (b) (1982). Specifically, the petition alleged that the appellant had left her two-year-old child with the child’s maternal grandmother, and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Matter of Welfare of ClausenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re the Welfare of J.W.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Thompson v. ThompsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re the Welfare of J.K.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. JaworskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Matter of Welfare of DDKCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.