Legal Opinion
Dill v. Workman
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 15, 2008No. 08-5041PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Daniel Dill, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) to appeal the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habe-as petition. We deny his request for a COA and dismiss the appeal. 1
On October 29, 2003, Mr. Dill was convicted by a jury in Oklahoma state court on five felony counts. The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals (“OCCA”) affirmed his conviction on January 4, 2005. Mr. Dill did not seek a writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court. On March 23,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Marsh v. SoaresCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Locke v. SaffleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Rhine v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Castillo v. Attorney Gen. of N.M.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
- Armah v. DowlingDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2021
- Ballard v. MartinDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2020
- Diaz v. HarpeDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2023
- Forth v. MartinezDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.