Legal Opinion

Lacher v. Engel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 20, 2006PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Catterson, J.

In this defamation action, both plaintiff and defendant are attorneys. Plaintiff alleges that defendant filed a sham complaint on behalf of plaintiffs former client solely for the purpose of allowing defendant to defame plaintiff while claiming the benefit of privilege. Defendant now appeals from an order which denied in part his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

The plaintiff in this action is attorney Michael Lachen The defendant is attorney Thomas Engel. For approximately 18 months, starting in early 2002, plaintiff and his firm, Lacher &…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Youmans v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Richbell Information Services, Inc. v. Jupiter Partners, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World Christianity v. New York Times Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Andrews v. . GardinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Moore v. Manufacturers' National Bank of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Biro v. Condé NastDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. Greenberg v. SpitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. Fuji Photo Film U.S.A., Inc. v. McNultyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  4. Friedman v. Bloomberg L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  5. Sexter & Warmflash, P.C. v. MargrabeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API