Legal Opinion

King v. Kelley Springfield Tire Co.

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided February 18, 2002No. I.C. NO. 538736Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Full Commission has reviewed the Deputy Commissioner's Opinion and Award based on the record of the proceedings before the Deputy Commissioner. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, and having reviewed the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission hereby affirms the Opinion and Award with minor modifications.

EVIDENTIARY RULING

Plaintiff complains that the Deputy Commissioner erred in admitting hearsay documents to the effect that plaintiff defrauded, or attempted to defraud,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seagraves v. Austin Co. of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Haponski v. Constructor's Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Buchanan v. Hunter Douglas, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API