Legal Opinion

Gregory Howard v. Herbert Grinage

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 3, 1996No. 94-2234PublishedCited by 329 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYAN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff, Gregory Howard, an inmate at the State Prison of Southern Michigan (SPSM), originally brought this procedural due process case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging a deprivation of a liberty interest for being confined to protective segregation and to increased security confinement without administrative hearings or review. In Howard v. Grinage, 6 F.3d 410 (6th Cir.1993) (Howard I), this court found that plaintiff had asserted a constitutionally protected liberty interest and remanded the case to the district court for a determination of whether defendants’ conduct…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by329 opinions

  1. Brown v. MontoyaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. Bridgett Handy-Clay v. City of Memphis, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  3. Pittman v. Cuyahoga County Department of Children & Family ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  4. Charles Selby v. Patricia CarusoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  5. Jane Doe v. Claiborne County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

324 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API