Legal Opinion
Pete v. Lampi
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 17, 1925No. 24,421PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Defendant Lampi conducted a saloon in the city of Ely for several years. Defendant Southern Surety Company was the surety on his bond for the year beginning June 5, 1915, and also for the year beginning June 5,. 1916. Defendant Aetna Casualty & Surety Company was the surety on his bond for the year beginning June 5, 1917. Each of the three bonds was for the sum of $2,000. On December 29, 1917, Herman Pete died while in a drunken stupor in Lampi’s saloon. Plaintiff, his wife, alleging that his death resulted from intoxication caused by liquor illegally furnished him by Lampi, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fest v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Wardell v. McConnellNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- Posch v. Lion Bonding & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Pete v. LampiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Miles v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Village of Brooten, a Municipal Corporation v. Cudahy Packing Company, a Corporation, and the Travelers Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Sworski v. ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Burns v. Van BuskirkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Golden v. Lerch Bros. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941