Legal Opinion
Häagen-Dazs, Inc. v. Frusen Glädjé Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 9, 1980No. 80 Civ. 1930 (KTD)PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY, District Judge:
Successful commercial marketing has many rewards. Most important to the marketer are the financial rewards to be reaped. However, when a manufacturer develops a novel marketing approach — a commercial concept meeting with a receptive consumer — the concept is often imitated. This is precisely what occurred in the case at bar.
Plaintiff, Haagen-Dazs, Inc., is the producer of Haagen-Dazs ice cream. Haagen-Dazs has come to be known as a premium ice cream product. The defendants are the producers and distributors of Frusen Gladjé ice cream which,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders, Inc. v. Pussycat Cinema, Ltd. And Michael ZaffaranoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- D C Comics, Inc. v. PowersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
3Cited by36 opinions
- Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. v. American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Aromatique, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Gold Seal, Inc., and Darrell Bufford, Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. v. American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999
- Prufrock Ltd., Inc. v. Dan Lasater Allan Roberts Garland Streett Dixie Management, Inc., Individually & D/B/A Spring House RestaurantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Murphy v. Provident Mutual Life Insurance Company of Philadelphia, AimsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.