Legal Opinion

State v. Hammer

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 2013No. DA 12-0297PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wheat

¶1 Floyd Hammer (Floyd) appeals his conviction for Criminal Possession with Intent to Distribute by the Twentieth Judicial District Court, Lake County. Floyd specifically challenges the District Court’s treatment of his pre-trial complaint concerning his trial counsel’s failure to contact a certain witness, the Court’s denial of his motion for a new trial, and the Court’s assessment of fees, costs, and surcharges in the written judgment that were not included in the oral pronouncement of his sentence. We affirm the conviction but we also conclude that it is necessary to remand this case to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. FinleyMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. LenihanMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. StewartMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. GallagherMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. MicklonMontana Supreme Court · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. MacGregorMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. BarrowsMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. D. IngramMontana Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. B. HooperMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. LogueMontana Supreme Court · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API