Legal Opinion
Norman E. Krehl v. Baskin-Robbins Ice Cream Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 4, 1982No. 80-5068PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELY, Circuit Judge:
In this class action antitrust suit against Baskin-Robbins Ice Cream Company [BRI-CO] and its area franchisors, 1 certain franchisees 2 appeal from an order of involuntary dismissal entered against them by the District Court. Because franchisees stipulated that Baskin-Robbins would be entitled to judgment absent proof of a per se violation of the antitrust laws, we have no occasion to consider the lawfulness of the challenged business practices under the so-called “rule of reason.” We affirm.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
BRICO, the nation’s largest chain of ice cream specialty…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. Topco Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Aydin Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Loral Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Conic Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Klamath-Lake Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. Klamath Medical Service BureauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- John M. Dimidowich, Dba Micro Image v. Bell & HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Federal Trade Commission v. Warner Communications Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Northrop Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.