Legal Opinion
Robert Reed v. Daniel Hoy Douglas County Douglas County Sheriff's Office
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 18, 1990No. 87-4324PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Robert Reed brought an action against Deputy Daniel Hoy and Douglas County, alleging that his constitutional rights were violated by Hoy’s use of excessive force. After a full trial, the jury found for the defendants. Reed appeals, alleging various errors in jury instructions and admission of evidence. We reverse and remand.
I
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
On August 18, 1984, Deputy Daniel Hoy was dispatched to the residence of plaintiff Robert Reed to investigate a reported domestic disturbance. When Hoy arrived at Reed’s house, Reed was crouched outside the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Marlene Eberle, and Robert Kiser v. City of Anaheim Anaheim Police Department P. Shepard Hagenson MonsoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Hammer v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Gilbert Hostler v. Captain Groves Robert J. Flanagan David R. MacKay Robert I. Cassady Frank Terry Richard T. Cezanc Donald B. Wawrzaszek Troy WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Efrain Becerra-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Grant v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.