Parrott v. Fletcher
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pannell, Judge.
1. Inasmuch as the evidence was sufficient to authorize a finding that the plaintiff’s negligence was the sole proximate cause of the injuries to plaintiff, or that plaintiff’s negligence contributed to his injuries, there was no error in charging the law of comparative negligence or charging that plaintiff would not be entitled to recover if his own negligence were the sole proximate cause of his injuries; nor, in view of such evidence, can we say that the verdict of $1,260 was so small as to indicate bias or prejudice on the part of the jury. Hunt v. Western &c. R., 49 Ga.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Hunt v. PollardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance v. JessupCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Bowen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Hunt v. Western & Atlantic RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Klag v. Home Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Fargason v. PervisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- McDonald v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Clyde v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Cox v. Associated Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.