Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Scott v. Metropolitan Health Corp.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided June 23, 2005No. 1:02-CV-485PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHARD ALAN ENSLEN, District Judge.
The Law is but a Looking Glass;
Not all like the reflections cast.
A. BACKGROUND
Defendants Metropolitan Health Corporation, d/b/a Metropolitan Hospital (“Metropolitan”) and Michael Faas (collectively, Defendants) have moved for summary judgment as to all counts of Plaintiff Mary Scott’s Revised Second Amended Complaint except her Count II claim that they breached her employment contract by failing to fund a matching contribution to her 403(b) Retirement Supplement Plan. The Motion has been fully briefed and oral argument is unnecessary since the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harrington v. Aggregate Industries-Northeast Region, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Scott v. Metropolitan Health Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- McCollum v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2014
- CROSBIE v. HIGHMARK, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Paul Lewis Richard v. Jonathan D. Jeffcoat, Sergeant F.L. Finch, and Michael WilfongDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.