Legal Opinion

Lane v. Dayton

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1899PublishedCited by 10 opinions

FROM RHEA. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Rhea County. • James Gr. Parks, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSnodgrass, C. J.

This is a suit at law by an infant for damages alleged to have been sustained by the negligent killing of her husband. Defendant’s eighth plea was accord and satisfaction — that it had paid plaintiff $150 in cash and other consideration, aggregating $200, in full satisfaction of her claim, before 'the institution of this suit. The plaintiff demurred to this plea on the ground that the declaration showed that plaintiff was, and still is, an infant, and hence was not bound by such an executed contract, and was not bound to refund, or tender with the plea, the consideration received; but she…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Seeck v. JakelOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Solomon v. FloWarr Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  3. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. GiardinoTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Glover v. L. N.R.R. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Arizona Eastern Railroad v. CarilloArizona Supreme Court · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API