State v. Davis
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
Jeff Rose, Chief Justice *694The State of Texas filed this appeal contending that the district court abused its discretion by setting aside the indictment against Dennis Davis for violation of his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. The State contends that the court's order dismissing the indictment was not justified by a properly conducted analysis under Barker v. Wingo , 407 U.S. 514, 530, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972). We will reverse the district court's order.
BACKGROUND
Our speedy-trial analysis occurs in the context of a long procedural history encompassing Davis's indictment,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Vermont v. BrillonSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Andres Lee Schuman Jr. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2024
- Bobbi Battishia White v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2024
- Cameron Warren v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2025
- Clifford Eddie Johnson, Jr. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2026
- Corles Andre Giles v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2019
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.