Legal Opinion

Groark v. Thorleif Larsen & Son, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 17, 1992No. 1-91-0160PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE GREIMAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

In this retaliatory discharge action, plaintiff, Philip Groark, appeals from the circuit court’s dismissal of his complaint as against one defendant, Larsen/Precision Joint Venture, upon its motion under section 2 — 619 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 110, par. 2 — 619).

We affirm.

Plaintiff filed a two-count second amended complaint seeking damages for retaliatory discharge against three named defendants: (1) Thorleif Larsen & Son, Inc. (Larsen); (2) Precision Contractors, Inc. (Precision); and (3) Larsen/Precision Joint Venture (Joint…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Burtell v. First Charter Service Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Midgett v. Sackett-Chicago, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Bell v. Louisville & NashVille RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Smith v. Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Pat Roger v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Romanek v. ConnellyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  3. Kaporovskiy v. Grecian Delight Foods, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. Gomez v. the Finishing Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. Hess v. Clarcor, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API