Legal Opinion
Oregon City v. Clackamas County
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCo Show, J.
Section 605, Or. L., prescribes the duty of a writ of review in this language:
“The writ shall be concurrent with the right of appeal, and shall be allowed in all cases where the inferior court, officer, or tribunal in the exercise of judicial functions appears to have exercised such functions erroneously, or to have exceeded its or his jurisdiction, to the injury of some substantial right of the plaintiff, and not otherwise.
Before a writ of review will issue it must appear from the petition that the inferior court, officer of tribunal whose order is sought to be reviewed was exercising…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Sustar v. County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Oregon Coal Co. v. Coos Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. Baker CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Holmes v. ColeOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- City of Astoria v. CorneliusOregon Supreme Court · 1925
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- County of Washoe v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1961
- White v. VogtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State Ex Rel. Columbia County School District No. 13 v. Columbia CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Kamm v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.