Legal Opinion

Speyer, Inc. v. Humble Oil & Refining Company

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 1967No. C. A. 1177PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLSON, District Judge.

Henry W. Buhl has been engaged in the taxicab business in the City of Erie in this District since 1935. Under the Public Utility Laws of Pennsylvania, he operates Yellow taxicabs. But to garage and to maintain his cabs, he formed the corporation, plaintiff Speyer, which owns the building. The cab business is owned by plaintiff Yellow Cab. Mr. Buhl owns all of the stock of both corporations except for nominal shares, and was and is the force behind the operation of both plaintiffs.

On April 24, 1964 a disastrous gasoline fire occurred on plaintiffs’ premises which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Francioni v. Gibsonia Truck Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Stang v. Hertz CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Perfection Paint & Color Co. v. KondurisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Dorsey v. Yoder CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Speyer, Inc. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API