Legal Opinion

Richards v. General Motors Corp.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 31, 1994No. 91-CV-10104-BC, 93-CV-10122-BCPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CLELAND, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

These consolidated cases are before the court on Plaintiffs’ respective Motions in Support of Jury Demand. Also before the court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff Campbell’s original Complaint.- For the reasons stated herein,

IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiffs’ re- • spective Motions in Support of Jury Demand are denied, and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff Campbell’s original Complaint is granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, the court holds that the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Unisys Corp. Retiree Medical Benefit "Erisa" Litigation, Unisys CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Markert v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Ciccarelli v. Gichner Systems Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Helwig v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995
  5. Iwans v. Aetna Life Ins. Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API