Legal Opinion

Bartholomew v. Shipe

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 30, 1923No. 438-3816PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerman, J.

On April 8, 1915, E. F. Fields and others filed petition in the district court of Travis county against E. C. Bartholomew, M. M. Shipe, and Patrick Gaffney, to abate a nuisance alleged to be caused by noxious and stagnant waters being permitted to stand in a gravel pit located on a 10-acre block of land in the city of Austin. It was alleged that Shipe owned all of said gravel pit, except 150 by 200 feet out of the north end owned by Bartholomew and 150 by 257 feet out of the southwest corner owned by Gaffney. The first action taken by the court was based on plaintiffs’ second amended original…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. Smith & Hildebrand & HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Sun Company v. WyattCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Pullman Co. v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Smith v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  5. Shipe v. BartholomewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goldsmith & Powell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Andel v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API