Legal Opinion

Schwartz & Co. v. Aimwell Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 23, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, J.:

D. A. Schulte, Inc., was lessee for ten years of some real property in Bridgeport, Conn. It leased to the Aimwell Company, Inc., the said premises. The Aimwell Company made a contract with plaintiff for certain repairs on the property. This contract and these repairs were made with the consent of D. A. Schulte, Inc., as expressed in the lease itself, who exacted a bond from the Aimwell Company to pay for all the material used and work put upon the premises in the making of these repairs. This action is upon that bond. Both defendants are defending. These repairs were not paid for by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Church E. Gates & Co. v. National Fair & Exposition Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Aeschlimann v. . Presbyterian HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Ringle v. . Wallis Iron WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Hathaway v. Davis & RankinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  5. Avery v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harrington Bros. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  2. Weinheimer v. HutzlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  3. Adams Engineering Co. v. MenowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API