Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Perez

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2001No. 99-3108-CRPublished

1ConcurrenceJon P. Wilcox, J.

¶ 62. (concurring). I concur with the majority opinion but write separately to emphasize the importance of prosecutorial discretion in our judicial system,- particularly in the present context involving the forfeiture of hunting gear. The majority notes that "[t]he forfeiture statute does not distinguish between 'good' lawbreakers and 'bad' ones." Majority op. at ¶ 60. The failure of our statutes to make such distinctions is a primary justification for prosecutorial discretion, which is grounded in Wis. Stat. § 968.02(1). As the court of appeals has noted, *611"[t]he duty of a district attorney…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. KarpinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Jones v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. AnnalaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API