Legal Opinion

Farrar v. United States

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided September 15, 1964No. Civ. A. No. C-64-77PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RABINOVITZ, District Judge.

Samuel Patrick Farrar filed his petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate the judgment and sentence based upon his plea of guilty to charges of counterfeiting. He alleged numerous points which may be summarized, inter alia, as follows: That petitioner did not have the assistance of counsel at the time of his interrogation by police officials; that petitioner did not have effective assistance of counsel, in that counsel was not appointed until several minutes before a plea of guilty was entered; and that petitioner was threatened and intimidated by police officials.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Alphonzo Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  3. United States v. Ralph GarguiloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  4. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  5. Joseph Morris Kennedy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. George Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  2. United States v. Samuel Patrick FarrarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
  3. Petway v. StallingsDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1965
  4. Garcia v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Baker v. BaileyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API