Farrar v. United States
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
RABINOVITZ, District Judge.
Samuel Patrick Farrar filed his petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate the judgment and sentence based upon his plea of guilty to charges of counterfeiting. He alleged numerous points which may be summarized, inter alia, as follows: That petitioner did not have the assistance of counsel at the time of his interrogation by police officials; that petitioner did not have effective assistance of counsel, in that counsel was not appointed until several minutes before a plea of guilty was entered; and that petitioner was threatened and intimidated by police officials.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Alphonzo Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- United States v. Ralph GarguiloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Joseph Morris Kennedy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- George Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Samuel Patrick FarrarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Petway v. StallingsDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1965
- Garcia v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Baker v. BaileyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1965