Legal Opinion

Application of Dufault

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 24, 1954No. Patent Appeal 6060PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the re-, jeetion by the Primary Examiner of claims 3 and 4 of appellant’s reissue application.

The claims read as follows:

“3. A burner of the class described comprising in combination, a support member, an elongated tube member extending horizontally therefrom closed at its outer end and provided with ports along the upper side thereof, an elongated strut supported by said support member disposed parallel to and below said tube member, a plurality of plates having upwardly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Continental Oil Co. v. United States. United States v. Continental Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  2. H. W. Roos Co. v. McMillanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  3. Application of SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920
  4. Application of HayesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  5. In re ClaudeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cravens L. Wanlass, Energystics, Inc. And Wanlass International, Inc. v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Cravens L. Wanlass, Energystics, Inc. And Wanlass International, Inc. v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API