Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided June 17, 2024No. 4:19-cv-00379Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA HOWARD NELSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 19-CV-379-JFH-JFJ SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant. ORDER AND OPINION Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”) filed by Defendant Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (“SWBT”).1 Dkt. No. 31. The case arose after SWBT terminated the employment of Plaintiff Howard Nelson (“Plaintiff”). Dkt. No. 2-1. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants SWBT’s Motion. STANDARD “Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings, depositions, answers to…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API