Legal Opinion

Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 1935No. Civ. No. 5366PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendant, Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, has appealed from a judgment which was rendered in favor of the cross-defendants, G. Wilson and F. B. Edson, in a suit on guardianship bonds against the sureties on account of the misappropriation of the funds of the estate by the former guardian of an incompetent person.

William Barlow was appointed guardian of the estate of Elmer J. Barlow, an incompetent person, April 19, 1926. Pursuant to an order of the probate court he filed a guardianship bond in the sum of $2,000 with the cross-defendants Wilson and Edson as sureties thereon. In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Todhunter v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Evans v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Hudgins v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Rapp v. Southern Service Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Olcese v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of PailheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Thorpe v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Winston v. SlatonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API