Legal Opinion

In Re Memmi

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 1947No. Crim. 4147PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

This is a proceeding in habeas corpus brought to recover the custody of a minor child of petitioner and respondent allegedly at present unlawfully detained by the latter. The writ having issued, a return was made thereto by respondent who has possession of the child and the matter is now before us to determine as between petitioner and respondent, the right to the custody of said minor, Gracie Ann Memmi.

The history of the case as disclosed by the record is that petitioner Joseph Memmi and respondent Marion B. Whit-taker (formerly Marion B. Memmi) were married to each other February 22, 1941,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foster v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. In Re WenmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. In Re KyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. In Re MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lerner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Helton v. CrawleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  3. Ferreira v. FerreiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Leathers v. LeathersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Bourland v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API