Hildebrand v. First Nat. Bank of Fairfield
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
Appellant seeks a rehearing that she may now be permitted to give security for costs of appeal, and she cites in support of this claim Coleman v. Smith, 52 Ala. 259; Cahalan v. Monroe, 65 Ala. 254; Guy v. Lee, 80 Ala. 346. We note in those cases that this -court, in holding that a married woman could not appeal without giving security for the costs, made an order allowing her time in which to do so. When those cases were decided, the time for perfecting an appeal was controlled by the Rev. Code of 1867, or Code 1876, sections 3508, 3949, respectively. They allowed an appeal from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burgin v. SuggSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Peters v. Chas. Schuessler & SonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Snider v. FunderburkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Cahalan v. Monroe, Smaltz & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Guy v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.