M.M. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtFernandez, J.
M.M., a juvenile, appeals his conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia. We reverse because the State failed to present evidence demonstrating that the residue from M.M.’s pipe was a controlled substance. Additionally, the State failed to present evidence to prove that M.M. had possession of paraphernalia with the intent to use it to consume a controlled substance.
During the State’s case-in-chief, law enforcement officers Ray Quintero and Peter Delgado testified that they drove to M.M.’s apartment building after they received a dispatch call. Officer Quintero knocked on the apartment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- State v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- A.A. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Pama v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- T.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- BRYAN CARLOS RODRIGUEZ v. THE STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
- R. C. v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- R.C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018