Legal Opinion

M.M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 3, 2014No. 3D13-3012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFernandez, J.

M.M., a juvenile, appeals his conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia. We reverse because the State failed to present evidence demonstrating that the residue from M.M.’s pipe was a controlled substance. Additionally, the State failed to present evidence to prove that M.M. had possession of paraphernalia with the intent to use it to consume a controlled substance.

During the State’s case-in-chief, law enforcement officers Ray Quintero and Peter Delgado testified that they drove to M.M.’s apartment building after they received a dispatch call. Officer Quintero knocked on the apartment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. State v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. A.A. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Pama v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. T.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. BRYAN CARLOS RODRIGUEZ v. THE STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
  2. R. C. v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  3. R.C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API