Lane v. Bell
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtDato, J.
*63To prevail in a malicious prosecution action under California law, a malicious prosecution plaintiff (the defendant in the underlying action)
*64must show that (1) the plaintiff in the underlying action pursued a claim with subjective malice, (2) the claim was brought without objective probable cause, and (3) the underlying action was terminated on the merits in favor of the defendant. The issue in this case is a seemingly simple one. The plaintiff in the underlying action brought multiple claims and lost many, perhaps most of them, but prevailed on at least one. Can the defendant bring a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Casa Herrera, Inc. v. BeydounCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cox v. Griffin, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- David Griffith v. Roger Hemphill, Donald Davis, and JDO Law, PCAlaska Supreme Court · 2025
- Acres v. MarstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Acres v. MarstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Citizens of Humanity, LLC v. HassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.