Legal Opinion
Dickman v. City of Santa Fe
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided July 26, 1989No. Civ. No. 88-0074 JPPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
724 F.Supp. 1341 (1989)
Michael DICKMAN and Marcy Dickman, Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF SANTA FE, Defendant.
Civ. No. 88-0074 JP.
United States District Court, D. New Mexico.
July 26, 1989.
Michael Dickman and Marcy Dickman, Santa Fe, N.M., pro se.
James C. McKay, City Atty., Santa Fe, N.M. for City of Santa Fe.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PARKER, District Judge.
The subjects of this opinion and order are plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction and defendant's Motion to Order Joinder of Necessary and Indispensable Parties or in the Alternative to Dismiss for Failure to Join Indispensable Parties. An…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Ralph L. Stanley, Administrator, Urban Mass Transportation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Daryl B. Lundgrin v. W. Graham Claytor, Secretary of the Navy of the United States, and the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clairton Sportsmen's Club v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Piedmont Environmental Council v. United States Department of TransportationDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2001
- PIEDMONT ENVIRON. v. US Dept. of Transp.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2001