Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Board of Public Welfare

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 26, 1943PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, C.J.

This is a petition brought in the Superior Court by the Attorney General against the members of the board of public welfare of the city of Northampton for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondents to comply with the decision of the department of public welfare that Pearl L. Bracelor, residing in the city of Northampton, was *676eligible for aid with respect to a dependent child under the provisions of G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 118, § 2, as appearing in St. 1941, c. 593, § 1. The case was heard by a judge of the Superior Court on a statement of agreed facts, and at the request of the parties was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  2. Horrigan v. Mayor of PittsfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Inhabitants of Bridgewater v. Inhabitants of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  4. Hodgdon v. City of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. Bradford v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bureau of Old Age Assistance v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  2. Berube v. Selectmen of EdgartownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  3. Board of Health of North Adams v. Mayor of North AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Bonnet v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  5. City of Cambridge v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API