Legal Opinion
Eastern Refractories Co. v. Forty Eight Insulations, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 13, 1987No. 86 Civ. 1585 (WCC)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge.
Defendant Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (“3M”) has moved pursuant to Rule 12, Fed.R.Civ.P., for an order dismissing the complaint of plaintiff Eastern Refractories Company, Inc. For the reasons outlined below, defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted with respect to plaintiff’s claim for breach of warranty, but is denied with respect to the remaining four claims.
Background
On October 1, 1981, Eastern Refractories Company, Inc. (“ERCO”) contracted with BBC-Brown Boveri Inc. (“BBC”) to provide thermal insulation material to insulate…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- West v. Caterpillar Tractor Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Houdaille Industries, Inc. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Miller v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Collins Co. v. Carboline Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
- A.J. Decoster Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. HaddadDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1991
- Askanase v. FatjoDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1993
- Baker v. Latham Sparrowbush AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.