Legal Opinion
Baker v. Latham Sparrowbush Associates
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 23, 1992No. 91 Civ. 6673 (CBM)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOTLEY, District Judge.
Defendants’ motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the grounds of res judicata, the statute of limitations, and failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted is now before the Court. 1 For the purposes of this motion, the court must accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true and construe all allegations in the light most favorable to Plaintiff. See Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1686, 40 L.Ed.2d 90, 96 (1974); Jenkins v. McKeithen, 395 U.S. 411, 421-22, 89 S.Ct. 1843, 1848-49, 23…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gloria Baker v. Latham Sparrowbush Associates and Aaron KozakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Johnson v. AnhornDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- In Re In-Store Advertising Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Baker v. Latham Sparrowbush AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992