Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Weststar Mortgage Corp. v. Jackson

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 2002No. 21,179Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSutin, Judge

{58} I respectfully dissent with regard to the majority’s holding that the issues of whether Weststar initiated or procured Jackson’s criminal prosecution and whether Weststar’s primary motive was to obtain the return of money through the criminal process were propei’ly submitted to the jury. Because I would reverse on these issues, I do not address the punitive damages issue.

{59} Court scrutiny of malicious abuse of process actions is more demanding than that required in garden variety tort actions. We should carefully adhere to the watchwords of our precedent. The tort of malicious abuse of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Conway v. SmerlingMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  2. DeVaney v. Thriftway Marketing Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hughes v. Van BruggenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Zamora v. Creamland Dairies, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Kurschus v. PaineWebber, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API