Legal Opinion

Hall v. Novik

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 2003No. Docket 232260PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBandstra, J.

Defendant Michael Novik appeals by leave granted from an order of the circuit court denying his motion for modification of previous child-support orders. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

BACKGROUND FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

While unmarried, plaintiff Linda M. Hall gave birth to a child on December 20, 1990, following a relationship with Novik. On February 15, 1991, Hall filed a complaint for paternity against Novik. With the assistance of attorneys, the parties entered into a process of negotiation and an agreement was reached resulting in a court-approved consent order entered…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Tebo v. HavlikMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  5. People v. HamptonMichigan Supreme Court · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. W a Foote Memorial Hospital v. Michigan Assigned Claims PlanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. W a Foote Memorial Hospital v. Michigan Assigned Claims PlanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. W a Foote Memorial Hospital v. Michigan Assigned Claims PlanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API