Legal Opinion

Erie v. White

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 4, 1998No. 21425-3-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

Jacob Erie sued Kirk White for negligently-supplying equipment that Erie knowingly and voluntarily used to cut a tree. White moved for summary judgment, arguing assumption of risk. The trial court granted the motion, and we affirm.

At the outset, it is necessary to understand the difference between tree-climbing equipment and pole-climbing equipment, as described in the record here. A person using either type of equipment wears a belt or harness with a metal ring on each side. He or she clips a safety strap into one metal ring, wraps it around the tree or pole, then clips it into the other…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tincani v. Inland Empire Zoological SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Scott v. Pacific West Mountain ResortWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Kirk v. Washington State UniversityWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Wagenblast v. Odessa School District No. 105-157-166JWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Shorter v. DruryWashington Supreme Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Baseball Club of Seattle, L.P.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  2. Wirtz v. GilloglyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. Hvolboll v. Wolff Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Lascheid v. City of KennewickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Taylor v. Baseball Club of Seattle, LPCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API