Legal Opinion

Francis v. Tilyou

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, George 0. Tilyou, from, a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 8th day of March, 1897, upon the verdict of a jury.

1Opinion of the Court

Hatch, J.:

The notice of appeal states that the appellant appeals “ from the order and judgment heretofore made and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 8th day of March, 1897, * * * and from each and every part of said order and judgment.” The notice is dated April 3, 1897. At that time n.o formal order denying a motion for a new trial had been entered, and it was not entered, as disclosed by the record, until August, 1897. The clerk’s minutes, which may be considered as the record of an order denying a motion for a new trial, recite that such motion was made and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thurber v. . Harlem B., M. F.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Anderson v. . HowNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. George v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Day v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  2. McCarthy v. BarrettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. Ericson v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.New York Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Giorgio v. BattermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  5. Sugden v. PeiserAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API