Ohio Valley Coal Co. v. Pleasant Ridge Synfuels, L.L.C.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, J.
This action arises out of a grievance filed by the United Mine Workers of America (“UMWA”), charging that a coal mining company, The Ohio Valley Coal Company (“Ohio Valley”), wrongly assigned jobs in a synthetic fuel facility to non-union employees. This grievance resulted in an arbitration proceeding and eventually a ruling in favor of the UMWA. Ohio Valley and the owner of the synthetic fuel facility, Pleasant Ridge Synfuels, L.L.C. (“Pleasant Ridge”), sought judicial *612review to vacate the arbitration award. The district court granted summary judgment to the UMWA, and Ohio…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Major League Baseball Players Assn. v. GarveySupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Farmers Crop Insurance Alliance v. LauxDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
- Farmers Crop Insurance Alliance v. LauxDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
- Durham School Services, L.P. v. General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local Union No. 509, a/w International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
- Michigan Family Resources, Inc. v. Service Employees International Union Local 517mCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Michigan Family Resources, Inc. v. Service Employees International Union Local 517mCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006