Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Michigan Family Resources, Inc. v. Service Employees International Union Local 517m

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 27, 2006No. 04-2564Published

1ConcurrenceSutton, Circuit Judge

Nearly a half-century ago, the Supreme Court issued three watershed opinions designed to end the federal courts’ hostility to labor-arbitration awards. See United Steelworkers v. Am. Mfg. Co., 363 U.S. 564, 80 S.Ct. 1343, 4 L.Ed.2d 1403 (1960); United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574, 80 S.Ct. 1347, 4 L.Ed.2d 1409 (1960); United Steelworkers v. Enter. Wheel & Car Corp., 363 U.S. 593, 80 S.Ct. 1358, 4 L.Ed.2d 1424 (1960). In one of these decisions, the Court stated that “[t]he refusal of courts to review the merits of an arbitration award is the proper approach to…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API