Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Kempf

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1884PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Case made after iudgment from Washtenaw. (Joslyn, J.) Appeal from disallowance of executor’s claim. The estate had judgment below.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Appellant, as executor of Frederick Kempf, deceased, contributed from the funds of the estate $175 towards enabling the widow to erect a monument at an expense of $300. The children by a former marriage, who are residuary legatees, opposed this allowance when the executor’s account came up for settlement, and the probate court threw out this item. The circuit court allowed $100, but no more. The executor now appeals to this Court.

We think there can be no question of the propriety of allowing the honest payment by an executor for such a monument as is suitable to the condition of the estate…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Richardson v. McCloskeyTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Pease v. ChristmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Jackson v. Leech's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Crothers v. CrothersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  5. Phillips v. DuckettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API