Legal Opinion

Dolph v. Cortez

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 13, 1968No. 2 CA-CIV 329PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUCKER, Judge.

Appellee Elsie C. Cortez was the plaintiff in an action for declaratory judgment arising out of a contractual dispute between her and the defendant. The contract was for legal services, and the defendant’s fee was to be one/third of the proceeds, if any, resulting from such representation on a contingency basis.

At the trial, which was to the court, it was stipulated by the parties that the one/third amount was a reasonable fee, and the trial court found that the parties had entered into a valid contract and that the plaintiff, without legal cause or justification, discharged…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. TangArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Cagle v. CarrArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Tiller v. TillerArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Barrett v. HineyArizona Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McCormick v. RomansSupreme Court of Virginia · 1973
  2. Associated Students of the University v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  3. Sun City Water Co. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Acuna v. KroackCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  5. Lake Havasu Community Hospital, Inc. v. Arizona Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API