Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Farroba

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 2, 1942No. 36527Published

1DissentO’Niell, Chief Justice

There are several reasons why I did not refer to the question of venue in the original opinion which I wrote for the court in this case. In the first place, the question was not tendered as a preliminary exception to the jurisdiction of the court, or before the trial of the case on its merits, but was presented during the progress of the trial and was dealt with as a matter of defense. In fact the judge’s decision on the question was not even excepted to. In the second place, the question whether the alleged offense of catching salf-water shrimp in the waters of the state was committed inside…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hebert v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Skiriotes v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Castillo v. McConnicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. United Gas Public Service Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API