Legal Opinion

Porter v. Spring

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 16, 1924PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is a suit in equity wherein the plaintiff seeks to have set aside a claim for curtesy filed by him with respect to the settlement of the estate of his testate wife. After a demurrer to the bill had been overruled, the case was referred to a master, under a rule which required him to make report of his findings together with such facts and questions of law as either party might request.

The evidence is not reported. Therefore the facts found by the master must stand unless they are mutually inconsistent or contradictory. Glover v. Waltham Laundry Co. 235 Mass. 330, 334, and cases there…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Glover v. Waltham Laundry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Reggio v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Watson v. WatsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  4. Dzuris v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. Wheaton Building & Lumber Co. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hartt v. HarttWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Martin v. JablonskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Springfield Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Boston & Maine Railroad v. Town of GreenfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Simpkins v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API