Legal Opinion

(HC) Rice v. Paramo

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 28, 2022No. 1:18-cv-00111Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUSTIN EUGENE RICE, Case No. 1:18-cv-00111-JLT-JDP (HC) 12 Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THE AMENDED PETITION FOR 13 v. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BE DENIED 14 DANIEL PARAMO, OBJECTIONS DUE IN FOURTEEN DAYS 15 Respondent. ECF No. 32 16 17 Petitioner Justin Eugene Rice, a state prisoner represented by counsel, seeks a writ of 18 habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He maintains, inter alia, that his trial counsel was 19 constitutionally ineffective because that attorney made a split-second…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API