Legal Opinion
United States v. Hillman Housing Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 19, 2002No. 02 Civ. 626(GEL)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LYNCH, District Judge.
When people complain to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) that they have suffered from illegal housing discrimination, the Fair Housing Act requires, among other things, that HUD “shall, to the extent feasible, engage in conciliation with respect to such complaint.” 42 U.S.C. § 3610(b)(1). Defendants move to dismiss this suit, which charges them with discriminating on the basis of national origin and religion against two Chinese-Amerieans who sought to purchase a cooperative apartment, arguing that HUD’s alleged…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brock v. Pierce CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mountain Side Mobile Estates Partnership v. Secretary Of Housing And Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Lee Morgan v. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Frank Riciotti, Iii, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Adcox v. Teledyne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Thomas C. Baumgardner v. The Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, on Behalf of Blanton B. HolleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. East River Housing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- SCHuman Affairs Commission v. YangSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020