Legal Opinion
In Re Wright
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California
Decided March 11, 2003No. SV-01-19115-GMPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION ON DEBTORS’ ATTORNEYS’ APPLICATION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL FEES
GERALDINE MUND, Chief Judge.
Debtors filed Chapter 13 on September 25, 2001 represented by the firm of Bayer, Wishman & Leotta (“BW & L”). In the Rule 2016(b) statement at the time the case was filed, the firm set forth that it had received $3,185 and that there was a contemplation that the total amount that would be due for legal services rendered and to be rendered in connection with the case was $5,185. It also stated that “the undersigned has not shared or agreed to share with any other entity, other than with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Busy Beaver Building Centers, Inc. Kirkpatrick & LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- In Re Harolyn Anderson, Debtor. Richard M. Anderson, Cross-Appellee v. Harolyn Anderson, Cross-Appellant, and John F. Bufe, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- In Re Glenn Electric Sales Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- In Re BergUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2001
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- In re BradleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
- Law Offices of Boone v. Derham-Burk (In Re Eliapo)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Messner v. Commerce Bank/Harrisburg, N.A. (In Re Smith)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- In Re JacobsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.