Legal Opinion

Fridley v. Horrigs

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 2, 2000No. C-3-99-008Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS’ OBJECTIONS (DOC. #67) TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. #63); PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #49) OVERRULED; DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 58) SUSTAINED; PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS AGAINST DONALD NEAL DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION; CONFERENCE CALL SET TO ESTABLISH HEARING DATE TO DETERMINE PLAINTIFFS’ DAMAGES AGAINST DEFENDANT DONALD GLUSZEK; PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS AGAINST OTHER DEFENDANTS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE

RICE, Chief Judge.

On September 2, 1997, Plaintiff…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API