Vincennes Packing Corp. v. Trosper
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The appellee herein says in his brief that he has no omissions or inaccuracies to point out in the appellant’s statement of the record in its brief. We, therefore, state that part of the proceedings necessary to an understanding of the questions presented, substantially as so stated by the appellant, as follows: This was an action by the appellee, John R. Trosper, against the appellant, Vincennes Packing Corporation, to recover damages for alleged personal injuries sustained by the appellee in a collision of a motorcycle on which he was riding, with a wagon, driven by one Ellis Dyer. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. KirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Indiana Union Traction Co. v. PringIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- W. A. Flint Co. v. John v. Farwell Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1922
- Irvine v. Baxter Stove Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gomez v. AdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Gibbs v. Miller Et Ux.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. GibbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Great American Tea Co. v. Van BurenIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
- Stewart v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.