Legal Opinion

Oakwood Smokeless Coal Corp. v. Meadows

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 6, 1945No. Record No. 2912PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

By notice of motion for judgment, the plaintiffs, Alta Medie Meadows and Henry Meadows, set out that they are the owners .in fee of certain lands in Buchanan county and that the defendant is the owner of mining rights on the land which adjoins' them. That mine, they say, is now being operated and that before its operation they had access to and used water from a spring on their land, which water was in all respects wholesome and palatable. They’say that now it has become polluted by drainage from this mine and unfit for human consumption. Damages are claimed. This issue was submitted to a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. SandersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  2. Marvin v. . Brewster Iron Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Williams v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  4. Wilms v. JessIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Mutual Paper Co. v. Hoague-Sprague Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Moore v. Johnson Service Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Phipps v. LeftwichSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  3. Hamlin v. PandapasSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  4. Nextel WIP Lease Corp. v. SaundersSupreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  5. Rastle v. GamsjagerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API