Disciplinary Counsel v. Harris
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.
{¶ 1} This issue in this case is whether Donald Harris, an attorney who is admitted to the practice of law in the District of Columbia and the Northern and Southern Districts of Ohio, but who is not admitted to the practice of law in the state of Ohio, is subject to the disciplinary authority of this court. Because Harris is not a member of the Ohio bar and has not taken an oath to be bound by the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct, these rules do not apply to him; rather, his conduct is subject to review by the Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law (“UPL Board”).
{¶ 2} Accordingly, we…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. CompManagement, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2004
- United States v. Willard Johnson, and H. Wesley Robinson and National Legal Professional AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. MischOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Greenspan v. Third Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Emhoff v. Medina Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. SealOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- In Re Application of SwendimanOhio Supreme Court · 2016
- Cleveland Metro. Bar Ass'n v. HurleyOhio Supreme Court · 2018
- Cleveland Firefighters Assn. IAFF Local 93 v. Cleveland Dept. of LawOhio Court of Claims · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.